Showing posts with label ideas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ideas. Show all posts

August 30, 2015

Ideas on how to improve greenery

             Me and my flatmate were discussing on ways to improve greenery to combat rising pollution levels and hit upon some ideas which looked decent. So, I thought of sharing them here.



               Best way to get people to do anything would be to give them some incentive. So, one of the ways we thought might help is giving tax benefit to people for planting trees. For example, let us say they can get income tax exemption of 10,000 for each tree they plant and ALSO maintain it. After 2 years, let us say the tree dies because you have not looked after it, you will have to pay taxes of all the previous years. This will make sure that they will look after the plant till it becomes a tree. Government can provide the seeds/plants to them and even a location to plant. But one problem with this is there will be a huge problem with auditing them. There will be huge paper work and it is practically impossible and not realistic to audit trees planted at individual level.
                To overcome this problem, the government can do a couple of things. Instead of giving tax benefit to individual tax payer, they can give tax benefit to companies. This will be much easier to manage both for government and for the company since government will give the plants and the land. There is not much extra effort from government on audit side and the company can not only easily plant and maintain trees very cheaply and get tax benefit, but also show it proudly as a Corporate Social Responsibility activity. If getting such land is difficult, they can just ask them to plant and maintain trees on either side of highways from some km to another km stone. This is a win-win situation as it is easy to audit and also provides some employment opportunity to villages near that highway. I am sure they can come up with numbers such that government need not forego too much tax and companies can both save some tax money and also proudly show it as CSR. Also, as more companies join this program, there will be additional pressure on other companies who might be reluctant if they feel tax benefit is not worth it.
                Since, this might not cover much area unless individuals are involved, they can provide a way for individual also to get tax benefit by encouraging some group formation. For example, there can be a company which just does planting and maintenance of tress on highways and "sells" it to individuals. Let me explain. Let us say there is a company where you can go and buy Rs.100 per tree(assuming tax benifit of Rs.10,000 per tree to simplify matters.) Since you get a tax benefit of 1000(assuming you are in 10% bracket which is most common), you have an incentive to buy one tree. Now if 1000 people buy these trees. company raises Rs. 1Lakh which should be enough to pay a gardener to look after, say 1km stretch of highway and still make profit. It will be easy for government also to now audit the tax benifit claimed by the individual. You just submit the form which says you are paying for the plant just like you submit a Life Insurance policy form. Only problem here is, if you say stop paying to the tree maintenance company after 3 years, the plant may die but there is no way government can know this and go back and take away the taxes it exempted from the last 3 years(since you are individual) but I am sure the plant will not now die since the ownership of that plant can just be shifted to some new customer by the company. This way, we can ensure lot of greenery 15 years down the line with minimal effort from all sides.
                  This can be further tuned like, say if you are ready to do it in some place in city itself or on city roads, you can get more benefit! So, we can make sure cities themselves will have good greenery. Govt can just auction main roads in the city to whoever bids the best in terms of tax benefit they are ready to claim! For example, let us say for highways, benefit is 10,000 per plant. Inside city, the bidding can start at benefit of 20,000 per plant and whoever bids the lowest wins it. The bid can go lesser than 10K also since it is easy for company to maintain roads with-in the city. That way, there is an incentive for company and also govt can get greenery easily.
                  I am trying to minimize effort from government here since, I am sure any effort I assume from government side will not actually fructify!



How does the idea sound? Do let me know.

April 10, 2009

History - Religion

Foreword: If you are a hardcore Theist, please don't get offended.
History: History has always been an intriguing subject to me. It is more interesting than science itself in some cases because the experimental results in science are authentic which is not true in the case of history as we only have an account of it written by someone resulting in it being limited by his/her sincerity. Further, science results can always be cross-checked by repeating the experiment. This is completely ruled out in the case of history.
Religion: Coming to religion, many educated modern people argue that religion was just a means of creating a feeling of safety in the common man and giving him some common guidelines to live so that all humans can co-exist. For a person to follow what scriptures say dumbly, he needs a lot of belief in it. This is done in the childhood(that beautiful stage in a human being's life when the wonderful quality of innocence is still there).
Many believe however that god is just a name given to the belief that brain is not the ultimate form of nature, that there is some other higher form of nature which is beyond our grasp.
I am not discussing all these ideas here. What I am presenting is my own version of relation between history and religion.
The theme: People say a lot of things about history.How far is it correct? No one knows what really happened back then,right? So,what if all the religious characters are just human beings from the past. What if Ramayana and Mahabharata are real stories of two great people called Rama and Krishna? Many do believe this is true. Maybe Rama was a great king very long ago. Valmiki wrote about his good deeds which over a period of 100's of years became legendary and people started calling him God. Maybe so are the works of Vyasa. It happens many times. When someone great is gone people tend to exaggerate his deeds and their stories, over the years become legends. Maybe that is the case with these persons. Maybe people started believing in those legends and elevated them to the highest position and called them Gods. And who knows someone across the timeline may have thought "why shouldn't I combine these two characters?" and gave the God a name, Vishnu and made these people, his incarnations. This is quite possible because the story of RAMA and KRISHNA occurred several thousands of years ago.
A Corollary: This leads to some interesting speculations. Who knows,maybe after several thousands of years, people may believe Gandhi as God. Maybe a new religion starts with Gandhi as god or who knows maybe he will be called another incarnation of Vishnu! Its just 60 years since he passed away and we already call him Mahatma. So, calling him God is quite possible in the future.
Note:Such a point was already made in a movie called "The man from the earth". It has an excellent plot. I was completely stunned by the movie. It deals with Christianity but I believe the idea is a generalised one. People who are highly religious may get offended by the movie but it really has strong point.
Just Joking: This maybe a bit too far fetched but on the lighter side what if people in the future believe Gandhi has actually comeback from life and even changed a bad man to his follower(Yes,I mean Munnabhai!!). In the movie the protagonist says Jesus did not die after he was Crossed. He escaped from there after 3 days. One of the followers saw him then and thought Jesus resurrected. What if this happens in the future in the case of Gandhi? Worse than all these what if there were no Rama or Krishna in the first place? What if Valmiki and Vyasa are just two writers who used to write novels about the ever standard "Good always triumphs over Evil"? They just wrote two series like say, LOTR and HP!!! They became famous and over the years the books might have become legendary elevating the protagonist's role to that of God!!! Too far-fetched huh? That's what I too thought. But why not give it a thought?
P.S: I just tried to compare religion and history. It is purely out of interest. I assure you I am not a strong supporter of atheism. I will be happy with any form of criticism on both my writing and my ideas!