The main difference arose because some of us thought against calling plants as living things.I present a small part of the argument.I would like the readers to develop the argument.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db69a/db69ae512382c3d64a75432585e86b1a3113a6da" alt=""
Person 1: We can call something as a living thing only if it can have feelings i.e., it should have sense of pain, at least.The bottom line is it should have brain. Now, everybody knows that a plant doesn't have brain.
Person 2: What you say is precisely correct but this ne
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f828a/f828a3732360ecbbc77f8b7e1fdc65d202dcd043" alt=""
Person 1: See how you are coming back to a FEELING finally,love in this case. Why is cell division so important?Even if cell division is great it has no sense of existence unless there is thought,right?So, only a thing that has brain which is responsible for feelings should be considered as living.
Person 2: Ok, let me put it this way.What is the opposite of LIFE?
Person 1: DEATH.
Person 2: When do you say a man is dead?
Person 1: When his heart stops pumping blood i.e., it stops beating.
Person 2: Precisely! It is not when the brain stops working right?Infact, that is why we have seperate term braindead for that organ. You knew that after heart stops beating,the brain can still function for a few minutes, right? So similarly life is when a nervous system is there and reproduction is there.
Person 1: But still don't you think if you call cell division as life, we should also call any chemical reaction as life?
Person 2: Dude, here we are getting identical being.That is not the case with a chemical reaction.
Person 1: Ok, that was a wrong point but................................
It went on like this.Isn't it interesting?
Interesting thoughts!
ReplyDeleteGood one.I'd like to add a point.The life form itself has its origin from chemical reactions .So may be now your discussion shd go to atomic level :P.BTW yours has the same template as mine, coincidence :).
ReplyDelete